Why India Still Doesn’t Build Tech Giants

Why India Still Doesn’t Build Tech Giants

Image related to Why India Still Doesn’t Build Tech Giants in AI Technology category, text overlay reading 'New Article!'
Ganesh H
17 Jun 2025
AI Technology

Not long ago, I sat across from a college friend at a busy Bengaluru café—one of those startup havens where everyone wears hoodies, drinks overpriced cold brews, and pretends to change the world from behind MacBooks. He was pitching a health-tech idea to an investor on Zoom. It was slick, smart, and—like so many Indian startups—designed to scale fast.

When he closed his laptop, I asked, “So what’s the five-year goal?”

He smiled, shrugged, and said, “Get acquired.”

That one sentence, as casual as it was, explains a lot about why India—despite its booming digital economy, world-class talent, and swelling investor interest—still struggles to build true tech giants.

We’ve got unicorns. But where are our Googles? Our Apples? Our Alibabas?

We’re great at building, no doubt. But we’re even better at exiting.

And maybe that’s the problem.

There’s a kind of gold rush mentality in the Indian startup scene. Everyone’s sprinting toward valuation, virality, and visibility. Founders focus on MVPs, burn rates, and the next funding round. Long-term vision? That's a luxury most can’t afford. We talk about IPOs, but rarely global impact.

Meanwhile, in Silicon Valley, building a tech empire isn’t just about disruption—it’s about domination. Facebook wasn’t created to get acquired. Neither was Amazon. These companies weren’t designed to solve a local problem for a fast buck. They were built to own categories, reshape behavior, define eras.

Part of the gap is cultural. Indian entrepreneurs often operate under the weight of family expectations. Many are first-generation risk-takers. There’s pressure to succeed fast and stabilize even faster. Parents want to hear "profits" not "platforms." For a lot of folks, a safe exit is the goal—not changing how the world communicates or shops or thinks.

And then there’s the system.

Our policies, while improving, still choke ambition at scale. Compliance is a full-time job. Taxation can be inconsistent. Infrastructure outside of Tier 1 cities remains shaky. Even internet speed, something we take for granted in metro bubbles, varies wildly. Regulation limps behind innovation. You want to launch a fintech product in India? Be ready for a long dance with paperwork.

Plus, we’re obsessed with foreign validation. We celebrate when a startup gets into Y Combinator or wins praise from an American VC. We crave that international nod. But why aren’t we setting the benchmarks instead of waiting to meet them?

Let’s not ignore the elephant in the server room: brain drain. Our best engineers often leave. Our most ambitious founders dream in dollars, pitch in San Francisco, and scale in the West. Can we really expect to build Indian tech empires if our brightest minds are wiring their ambition into another country’s ecosystem?

That said, it’s not all gloom. There’s hope brewing.

Look at Zoho. Bootstrapped, profitable, proudly Indian, and quietly building a global suite of business tools. Or Zerodha—India’s largest stock broker, built with no external funding. They’ve done it differently. They’ve stayed grounded while thinking big. It’s not flashy, but it’s sustainable.

What sets them apart? Patience. Discipline. A refusal to chase every shiny trend. They’re proof that you don’t need to play Silicon Valley’s game to win. You can play your own.

I remember another moment—this one during a panel in Delhi. A young founder asked a seasoned investor what India needs to create its first global tech powerhouse. The answer wasn’t capital, talent, or policy. It was mindset.

“We need to stop building startups,” he said. “And start building institutions.”

That hit hard.

Because the truth is, institutions last. They outlive trends, investors, and even founders. They shape culture. They take decades to build—but when done right, they change the future.

So why doesn’t India build tech giants?

Maybe it’s because we haven’t truly tried yet.

We’ve tried to impress VCs. We’ve tried to ride waves. We’ve tried to hack growth.

But we haven’t tried to build something that’ll still matter 50 years from now.

That kind of ambition takes more than funding rounds and flashy launches. It takes grit, vision, patience, and—perhaps most importantly—the courage to say, “I’m not here to exit. I’m here to endure.”


Comments

Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Do not post unnecessary or offensive content.

?>