“Justice delayed is justice denied.” We’ve heard that line so many times, it almost feels like background noise. But what if justice isn’t just delayed—but also for sale? What if the courtroom, the one place where truth is supposed to triumph, is quietly rotting from within?
That uncomfortable question haunts more and more Indians today. The judiciary—once hailed as the last hope for the common man—is now being viewed with growing suspicion. It's not just the endless delays that are draining faith from the system, but the more disturbing reality: corruption has seeped into the walls of justice itself.
When the Scales Tilt, Who Wins?
Let me tell you about Rahul, a friend of mine who owns a small manufacturing unit in Pune. A supplier breached a contract, so he took the matter to court. What he thought would be resolved in a year or two became a legal quagmire. Five years in, not a single meaningful hearing had happened. And worse? He kept hearing rumors that the other party had “managed” some court officials.
One evening over chai, he said something that stuck with me:
“I’m not just fighting a case anymore. I’m fighting a system that’s already decided who’s going to win.”
That’s the gut-punch truth for many. It's not just that justice is slow—it's that it feels stacked.
The Real Danger of Corruption in Courts
We’re not just talking about petty bribes or delayed files. Corruption in the judiciary strikes at the very heart of what democracy promises: fairness, equality, and protection. If a powerful businessman or politician can tilt a verdict with money or influence, where does that leave the rest of us?
India’s judicial system is overloaded—over 50 million cases are pending across all levels of courts. This backlog turns justice into a waiting game. For those with deep pockets, it’s easy to pull a few strings to jump the queue. For everyone else, justice gets stuck in limbo.
But beyond the statistics, there's something deeper at stake. Corruption turns courts into marketplaces where outcomes are negotiated instead of earned. The damage isn't just legal—it's moral.
Delayed Justice Isn’t Just an Inconvenience—It’s a Crisis
Every delayed judgment is a story of a life on hold. I met Sushma, a domestic violence survivor in Hyderabad, who filed a protection case in 2017. It still hasn’t been resolved.
“The court was supposed to be my escape,” she told me. “But I feel like I’m still trapped—just in a different kind of prison.”
Sushma’s pain isn’t rare. Land dispute cases, criminal trials, family matters—all suffer from this inertia. And the people most affected? The poor, the marginalized, the ones the system is supposed to defend the most.
When the powerful manipulate justice, the weak bleed silently.
Why Is This Happening?
It's a messy mix of problems.
First, the volume. Judges are human, and there just aren’t enough of them. India has one of the lowest judge-to-population ratios in the world. Add outdated processes, understaffed clerical systems, and ancient laws—and you’ve got a perfect recipe for gridlock.
Second, lack of transparency. The collegium system (how judges are appointed) is often criticized for being a secretive old boys’ club. Promotions and postings are not always based on merit. Without sunlight, shadows thrive.
Third, political and corporate pressure. Let’s not pretend the judiciary exists in a vacuum. In high-profile or sensitive cases, whispers of political influence or business lobbying are common. And unlike a politician, a judge isn’t voted out—they retire quietly, often with perks or post-retirement posts waiting.
Are There Any Signs of Hope?
Actually, yes.
Digitization has made court records more accessible. E-filing and virtual hearings—born out of necessity during COVID—have made things slightly faster and more transparent. In some instances, media coverage and public outrage have forced courts to act swiftly and fairly.
There are also upright judges out there—people who resist pressure, write powerful dissenting opinions, and uphold justice no matter the cost. They’re the flickers of hope in a system that feels increasingly dark.
But it’s not enough.
How Do We Fix This?
Fixing the judiciary won’t happen overnight. But here’s where we can start:
- Transparent appointments: Make the process for selecting judges open and accountable. The public deserves to know who’s on the bench and why.
- Speed up recruitment: Thousands of vacancies remain unfilled. Hire more judges and staff. No excuses.
- Accountability mechanisms: There needs to be a credible, independent body that investigates judicial misconduct. Currently, the judiciary polices itself—and that rarely ends well.
- Public pressure: Citizens must demand better. When people stop expecting justice, the system stops delivering it.
Why This Matters
A courtroom should be the one place where money, power, and connections don’t matter—only the truth does. When that belief dies, something far more dangerous takes its place: cynicism. And cynicism is a cancer that eats away at democracy.
We can’t afford to lose our faith in justice. Not now. Not ever.
Because when the last hope of fairness becomes just another game of influence, the soul of our democracy isn’t just wounded—it’s in danger of being lost forever.
Comments
Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Do not post unnecessary or offensive content.
Find This Comment Offensive
Choose your reason below and click on the Submit button. This will alert our moderators to take action.